“The University of Michigan recommends the following: there are very bicycle-friendly communities. It is, however, very important that bicyclists (and motorists) understand the rules of the road and how to stay safe while biking in the city. With an abundance of restaurants and shops downtown and various city parks to explore. Did you know that city ordinances require motorists to stop for pedestrians who are at or in crosswalks?  Walk with a friend, use designated sidewalks or paths, cross at designated crosswalks and don’t just look at signs but use your eyes looking both ways also.As we make the switch from warm to hot weather, it’s important to take the time to review tips for staying safe in the heat.  This means wear sunscreen for skin protection, drink plenty of water, limit alcoholic beverages, dress in loose-fitting, lightweight and light-colored clothing, and limit exercise outdoors in extreme heat.Summertime is often paired with grilling outdoors so this means place grills a minimum of 36″ away from your home, deck railings, and out from under eaves and overhanging branches, set up your grill on a flat, stable surface to prevent tipping, operate your grill safely by checking for leaks and opening the lid before lighting, maintain your grill by cleaning and inspecting it regularly and always have a fire extinguisher nearby.  Of course don’t forget the supervision of children and pets in also establishing a safe zone of at least three feet around the grill, where children and pets are not allowed.”

Division of Public Safety and Security University of Michigan –  DPSS (https://news.dpss.umich.edu/2024/06/1391)

“May sound so basic but not always followed so as a reminder to let the public know the best way to prevent HIV is to understand how the virus is transmitted and take steps to reduce your risk. If you’re living with HIV, understanding these practices can help prevent transmission to others.

HIV can’t be transmitted through saliva or skin-to-skin contact, such as hugging or shaking hands. The virus can only be transmitted by exchanging certain bodily fluids, including genital secretions and blood.

As a result, transmission most frequently occurs during condomless sex or shared use of syringes and other drug injection equipment.

Adopting certain harm reduction strategies, including safer sex and safer substance use or better yet no substance use, can help reduce the risk of contracting or transmitting the virus.

Although you have up to 72 hours to begin PEP, the medication is less likely to be effective over time. Additional medication must also be taken consistently and correctly for 28 days.

If you don’t have a primary care doctor or another healthcare professional to reach out to, you may be able to get a prescription for PEP at your local: health department, sexual health clinic, urgent care center or emergency room.

Know approximately 1.2 million people in the United States have HIV, according to HIV.gov. Of those people, 13% do not know they have it.  In 2021, there were 1,086,806 people living with HIV in the U.S. In 2021, 36,126 people were newly diagnosed with HIV.“

healthline (https://www.healthline.com/health/hiv-aids/hiv-prevention/hiv-prevention?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_cmpid=20958361886&utm_adgid=156321296365&utm_adid=688286705703&utm_network=g&utm_device=c&utm_keyword=&utm_adpos=&utm_gclid=EAIaIQobChMI8fKFhNj0hgMV-2BHAR2JDwgDEAMYASAAEgL8BPD_BwE&gad_source=1&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI8fKFhNj0hgMV-2BHAR2JDwgDEAMYASAAEgL8BPD_BwE#takeaway)

“National HIV Testing Day (NHTD) encourages HIV testing as a critical tool to help end the HIV epidemic in the United States. Observed annually on June 27, the 2024 NHTD theme is Level Up Your Self-Love: Check Your Status, emphasizing self-compassion, self-respect, and self-love in honoring health needs by getting an HIV test. When someone knows their HIV status, they can choose options to stay healthy.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in 2022, an estimated 1.2 million people in the United States had HIV, but 13 percent of people with HIV did not know their HIV status. HIV testing is the pathway to engage people in care and help them stay healthy, regardless of the test result. People who have a positive HIV test can start antiretroviral therapy (ART) to stay healthy. People who have a negative HIV test can learn how to access HIV prevention options like pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). CDC recommends that everyone aged 13–64 get tested for HIV at least once as part of routine health care. People with certain risk factors—such as having sex with someone who has HIV, sharing needles or drug injection equipment, or being treated for another sexually transmitted infection (STI)—should be tested for HIV at least once per year.”

HIVinfo.NIH.gov (https://hivinfo.nih.gov/understanding-hiv/hiv-aids-awareness-days/national-hiv-testing-day)

”Recent years have witnessed substantially increased research regarding sex differences in pain. The expansive body of literature in this area clearly suggests that men and women differ in their responses to pain, with increased pain sensitivity and risk for clinical pain commonly being observed among women. Also, differences in responsivity to pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain interventions have been observed; however, these effects are not always consistent and appear dependent on treatment type and characteristics of both the pain and the provider. Although the specific aetiological basis underlying these sex differences is unknown, it seems inevitable that multiple biological and psychosocial processes are contributing factors. For instance, emerging evidence suggests that genotype and endogenous opioid functioning play a causal role in these disparities, and considerable literature implicates sex hormones as factors influencing pain sensitivity. However, the specific modulatory effect of sex hormones on pain among men and women requires further exploration. Psychosocial processes such as pain coping and early-life exposure to stress may also explain sex differences in pain, in addition to stereotypical gender roles that may contribute to differences in pain expression.”

National Library of Medicine – NIH (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3690315/)

The nervous system’s dials for communicating chronic pain to the body work differently in male and female mice, according to a study published today in Nature Neuroscience. If this difference is also found in humans, it could lead to chronic pain treatments that are better tailored to the patient. But the most immediate impact might be in basic research — the earliest stages of work — since right now, the mice being used are almost exclusively male.

Chronic pain affects more than 100 million people in the US, which is more than heart disease, cancer, and diabetes combined. And many pain conditions occur more often in women than in men, according to the FDA. That’s why figuring out how male and female mice deal with pain — and whether they do so differently than humans — is so important. After all, most medical research — including pain research — starts with mice.

In the study, researchers focused on microglia, a type of immune cell that can be found in the brain and the spinal cord. These cells are known to play a role in the “volume knob” for pain, explains Jeffrey Mogil, a pain researcher at McGill University and a co-author of the study. The knob turns way up after an injury. A genetic study done in Mogil’s lab a few years ago had indicated that microglia weren’t as important in the pain circuit of female mice. So, the scientists decided to find out if interfering with the microglia would have the same effect in male and female mice.

Male mice had no pain, whereas female mice did

The researchers used mice that were suffering from a hypersensitivity to pain. The scientists gave them drugs that target the microglial cells in the spinal cord, in the hopes that this would prevent the animals from feeling pain. But only male mice responded to the drugs — the female mice still had an increased sensitivity to pain.

When the researchers repeated these experiments in mice under varying conditions, they saw the same results: male mice had no pain, whereas female mice did. “Whatever the manipulation is, in every case, blocking microglia or some part of the microglial system brings the pain sensitivity back to normal in male mice, and doesn’t do anything in female mice,” Mogil says.

Now looking at the human we see this: There is a growing body of literature that indicates women are more likely than men to be undertreated for their pain.

It appears that gender affects not only pain perception, pain coping, and pain reporting, but also pain-related behaviors, including use of healthcare and the social welfare system. It is also probable that men and women differ systematically in their responses to pain treatments, although further research is needed in this area.

For many common pain conditions, including migraine and tension-type headache, facial pain, and abdominal pain, population-based studies indicate higher prevalence rates in adult women than in adult men.

Despite the difficulties with human laboratory experiments on pain sensitivity, many investigators are willing to draw the inference from these studies that women are, in general, more sensitive to painful stimuli than men, and that this difference is biologically based.

Whatever the pain prevalence differences for men and women, most studies show that women seek healthcare for pain at a higher rate than men:

• • One study indicated that women are more likely to be given sedatives for their pain, while men are more likely to be given pain medication.

  • Faherty and Grier studied the administration of pain medication after abdominal surgery and found (after controlling for weight) that physicians prescribed less pain medication for women than for men ages 55 or older, and that nurses administered less pain medication to women than to men ages 25-54 years.

  • Beyer et al examined pain medication given to children and found that, after surgery, boys received significantly more codeine than girls, and girls were more likely than boys to be given acetaminophen.

  • In a 1994 study of 1,308 outpatients, Cleeland and colleagues found that women with metastatic cancer were significantly more likely than men with the same diagnosis to receive inadequate pain medications.

  • In a study of several hundred AIDS patients, Breitbart and colleagues found that, based on the WHO analgesic ladder guideline, women were significantly more likely than men to receive inadequate analgesic therapy.

  • A study by Weir and colleagues found that women are less likely than men to be referred to a specialty pain clinic, at least upon initial encounters with their physicians.

  • A study reviewing cancer care at seven outpatient clinics in California found that female cancer patients were prescribed half the pain medication as male patients with the same pain intensity scores.

  • Males outnumber females two to one in the burn population. This is related to male household and job roles, which increase the risk for burn injury. Furthermore, males more commonly engage in risk-taking behaviors involving chemicals, flammable materials, or electricity.So what do we see so for at this point:

• We feel pain more intensely than men, according to a new study of 11,000 men and women who were patients at the Stanford Hospital and Clinics.

• Researchers analyzed electronic medical records of patients’ reports of pain across a range of different diseases, and found a distinct gender-driven difference in how much discomfort patients say they felt. The study included 47 disorders — from cancer to back conditions and infectious diseases — and more than 161,000 patient-reported pain scores. The patients were all asked by nurses or other health personnel to rate their pain on an 11-point scale, with 0 representing “no pain” and 11 signifying the “worst pain imaginable”.

• Not surprisingly, most responses clustered around either the two extremes of very little pain or extreme pain or the middle score of 5. But overall, women were more likely to indicate higher pain levels than men, says lead author Dr. Atul Butte, chief of systems medicine in the department of pediatrics at Stanford University School of Medicine. And that was true across almost all of the different diseases. “That was the most surprising finding,” says Butte. “We completely wouldn’t have expected such a difference across almost all disorders, where women were reporting a whole pain point higher on the 0-to-10 scale than men.”

• Of course, self-reports can’t account for the fact that people may define tolerable and intolerable pain in vastly different ways, says Butte, but the fact that a gender difference emerged from such a large number of patients suggests that the effect is real.

• What accounts for the gender gap? Hormones may explain some of the difference — studies have shown that estrogen in women can help dampen the activity of pain receptors, helping them to tolerate higher levels of pain. That means, however, that they may become more sensitive to pain during low-estrogen parts of the menstrual cycle.

• There may also be explanations that have nothing to do with biology. Men, for example, may feel compelled by cultural stereotypes to be tough, and therefore report feeling less pain than they really do —especially when asked by the mostly female nursing staff.

Still, even if non-biological factors are influencing how much pain men and women report, Butte says the difference is worth noting. “The reasons may be biological or they may not be, but we should still be aware of the bias that patients have in reporting pain,” he says. He is hoping to continue the research by following up these results with surveys of patients’ ratings after they were treated for pain. That may help doctors to better address the real pain patients may be feeling.

Through the National Library of Medicine in 2022 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36038207/) They state; “Chronic pain affects 20% of adults and is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Women and girls are disproportionally affected by chronic pain. About half of chronic pain conditions are more common in women, with only 20% having a higher prevalence in men. There are also sex and gender differences in acute pain sensitivity. Pain is a subjective experience made up of sensory, cognitive, and emotional components. Consequently, there are multiple dimensions through which sex and gender can influence the pain experience. Historically, most preclinical pain research was conducted exclusively in male animals. However, recent studies that included females have revealed significant sex differences in the physiological mechanisms underlying pain, including sex specific involvement of different genes and proteins as well as distinct interactions between hormones and the immune system that influence the transmission of pain signals. Human neuroimaging has revealed sex and gender differences in the neural circuitry associated with pain, including sex specific brain alterations in chronic pain conditions. Clinical pain research suggests that gender can affect how an individual contextualizes and copes with pain. Gender may also influence the susceptibility to develop chronic pain. Sex and gender biases can impact how pain is perceived and treated clinically. Furthermore, the efficacy and side effects associated with different pain treatments can vary according to sex and gender. Therefore, preclinical and clinical research must include sex and gender analyses to understand basic mechanisms of pain and its relief, and to develop personalized pain treatment.”.

“CDC states the following:

• Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a group of inherited blood disorders. Abnormal hemoglobin is produced.
• Red blood cells become hard and sticky and get stuck in small blood vessels, resulting in pain and other serious complications.
• There are several types of SCD, some more severe than others.
• In the United States, SCD is often found at birth through routine newborn screening.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) affects about 100,000 people in the United States; more than 90% are non-Hispanic Black or African American, and an estimated 3%–9% are Hispanic or Latino.

The estimated life expectancy of those with SCD in the United States is more than 20 years shorter than the average expected.

Many people with SCD unfortunately do not receive the recommended healthcare screenings and treatments.”

Center for Disease Control and Prevention – CDC (https://www.cdc.gov/sickle-cell/data/index.html)

Having several health topics and one of those topics covers awareness on elder’s well being. Why some may even not realizing how significantly important this is to address in thinking should this even be addressed?

Obviously, YES is the answer to anyone in this world who thinks that question and here is the reason why. This was developed in 1963 for the purpose of professional development opportunities for community, hospital and residential services. Its focus is on those resources that are specifically concerned with older people’s mental health and wellbeing and those resources that are generally accessible on a statewide basis. The government even is involved that developed a program called a “Wellbeing in Later Life” with one major aspect on covering 1.)the understanding of anxiety and depression 2.) strategies to help manage core symptoms 3.)practical skills to practice each week to help recovery 4.) stories about how others have applied the skills to help them recover; which is one small area of what this covers with much more.

Regarding the global trend in particular on elders with health promoting their age it is predicted the amount of elders is considerably increasing from decades back.

With facts check this out:

The global population is ageing at a rapid rate. In 1950, just over five percent of the world’s population was 65 years or older. By 2006, that number had jumped to eight percent. By 2030, experts anticipate that older adults will comprise 13 percent of the total population—one in eight people will be 65 or older. While developing countries will experience the most rapid growth in ageing, with increases of up to 140 percent, developed countries will experience increases averaging 51 percent. (Women, who tend to outlive men, will comprise the bulk of the older adult population.) Simultaneously, overall population is declining in many countries due to low fertility rates, HIV/AIDS, and international migration. The United Nations estimates that the number of adults 60 years and older will outnumber children under the age of 15—an historical first—by 2045.

Not only is the world ageing, but it is also ageing differently. Life expectancy is increasing, with people 85 years and older—especially women—comprising the fa stest growing segment of the population in many countries. Notable exceptions include South Africa, where life expectancy dropped from 60 to 43 years in the last decade, primarily due to HIV/AIDS. Globally, more people are dying from non-communicable diseases and chronic, degenerative conditions than from infectious and parasitic diseases, a trend expected to grow in the next couple of decades. (Whether increased life expectancy will be associated with increases or decreases in disability status remains an open question.) At the same time, communicable diseases—especially HIV/AIDS—remain prevalent, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. In considering the benefits and consequences of population ageing, therefore, it is essential to consider not only longevity but also healthy life expectancy, or expected years of life free of illness, disease, and disability.

Looking at older adults (elders 65 and older)-Although older adults serve as essential resources to their communities, they face a great risk of marginalization. Older adults often experience both social de-evaluation and poverty upon leaving the labor market; financial market fluctuations contribute to income and social insecurity regardless of employment history, especially in countries with developing and transitioning economies. Groups particularly vulnerable to poverty and social devaluation in old age, due to cultural and institutional biases which affect people throughout the lifespan, include women, people with disabilities, people with a migration background, and people who do not belong to the majority racial or ethnic group of any given society. Moreover, older adults seeking support to maintain independence and quality of life frequently encounter either a lack of social services, especially in rural and remote areas, or services that are poor in quality or unresponsive to linguistic and cultural diversity.

Participation of older adults in societal development enhances the well-being both of older adults and of communities as a whole and depends on multiple factors.

Accordingly, the rising proportion of older people is placing upward concerns & pressure on overall health care spending in the developed world, although other factors such as income growth and advances in the technological capabilities of medicine generally play a much larger role.

Relatively little is known about aging and health care costs in the developing world. Many developing nations are just now establishing baseline estimates of the prevalence and incidence of various diseases and conditions. Initial findings from the WHO SAGE project, which provides data on blood pressure among women in six developing countries, show an upward trend by age in the percentage of women with moderate or severe hypertension, although the patterns and age-specific levels of hypertension vary among the countries. If rising hypertension rates in those populations are not adequately addressed, the resulting high rates of cerebrovascular (CVA-stroke) and cardiovascular disease are likely to require costly medical treatments that might have been avoided with antihypertensive therapies costing just a few cents per day per patient. Early detection and effective management of risk factors such as hypertension—and other important conditions such as diabetes, which can greatly complicate the treatment of cardiovascular disease—in developing countries can be inexpensive and effective ways of controlling future health care costs.

In high-income countries, heart disease, stroke, and cancer have long been the leading contributors to the overall disease burden. The burden from these and other chronic and non-communicable diseases is increasing in middle- and low-income countries as well.

To gauge the economic impact of shifting disease profiles in developing countries, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated the loss of economic output associated with chronic disease in 23 low- and middle-income nations, which together account for about 80 percent of the total chronic disease mortality in the developing world.

Largely because of global aging, the incidence of cancer is expected to accelerate in coming decades. The annual number of new cancer cases is projected to rise to 17 million by 2020, and reach 27 million by 2030. A growing proportion of the global total will be found in the less developed world, and by 2020, almost half of the world’s new cases will occur in Asia.

So regarding anyone who may have questioned today or at another time why is elder health important I think after reading this you would see why. The more unhealthy an elder person is in large populations the higher the population of unhealthy elders will be in society besides putting the cost of health living in communities higher. So if people stay healthy from childhood to geriatric age the less health problems we will have. National elder well being is a prime concern to be addressed and dealt with just like neonate, pediatric and adult to mid adult.  Every age in important and every age bracket has rights with vitally importance to address in there health!

“Much has changed in the United States over the past 100 years. Medicine has evolved as much as any field, with dramatic advances in diagnosis and treatment. Changing, too, is the American lifestyle, with its new emphasis on healthier diets and regular exercise and its declining dependence on tobacco. As a result of these developments, life expectancy is also changing, rising slowly but steadily year after year (see Table 1). One thing, though, has not changed — the gender gap. People of both sexes are living longer, but decade after decade, women continue to outpace men. In fact, the gap is wider now than it was a century ago.

The longevity gap is responsible for the striking demographic characteristics of older Americans. More than half of all women older than 65 are widows, and widows outnumber widowers by at least three to one. At age 65, for every 100 American women, there are only 77 men. At age 85, the disparity is even greater, with women outnumbering men by 2.6 to 1. And the longevity gap persists even into very old age, long after hormones have passed their peak; among centenarians, there are four females for every male.

The gender gap is not unique to America. In fact, every country with reliable health statistics reports that women live longer than men. The longevity gap is present both in industrialized societies and in developing countries. It’s a universal observation that suggests a basic difference between the health of men and women.”

Harvard Health Publishing – Harvard Medical School (https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/mars-vs-venus-the-gender-gap-in-health)